Yesterday’s Baby

The edge becomes the mainland soon enough: this much we know. One generation’s original idea is another generation’s old hat. Sometimes, often, it takes less than a generation. Yesterday’s baby is over the hill. You’ve got to eat your bananas whilst they’re green.

I’ve been reading Fjona Uu’s new book, The Brontesaurus Sisters (not The Brontosaurus Sisters, as some have suggested) and I’ve been pondering a few things. For instance, how does Uu fit into the ‘Mash-Up’ scene? Her first novel, Lava in a Cold Climate was, in one sense, a cross between several fictional forms – the early twentieth century comic novel, the late twentieth century apocalyptic novel and a mid-twentieth century Marxist text. Her second novel, Pincers in the Tower, melded historical fiction together with the absurd – a delicate balance, done with aplomb. The Brontesaurus Sisters, meanwhile, throws about half a dozen genres into the mix, effortlessly shifting between the gothic and the pre-historic, the romantic and semantics. In doing so, however, Uu moves dangerously close to the contemporary tradition mentioned above. I refer, in particular, to the vogue for ‘monster mash’ (see here for a more thorough description).

The question is, what differentiates Uu’s The Brontesaurus Sisters from recent bestseller Pride and Prejudice and Zombies? Has Uu, who originally turned to the mash-up as a means of expressing sincere Marxist sympathies, found herself part of a passing trend instead? She’s a talented writer, certainly, but she nonetheless runs the risk of getting caught up in a group of writers of lesser ability. Which is to say that perhaps it’s time she looked at another means of achieving her intellectual aims. Messing about with monsters, at this point in time, is only going to get her mis-categorized.

2 thoughts on “Yesterday’s Baby

  1. Surely there is also room in the world of knowledge and understanding – worlds for which I have the utmost respect, apart that is from when engaged in mindlessly assaulting, & with great violence, such worlds – but to reiterate, surely there is also room in said worlds for a Bronthesarus. WHat such an object might be I’m not quite clear, but perhaps like a thesaurus except with, as far as possible, an example of the word in question that one is looking up, being used within a novel by one of the Brontes, thus elucidating in a particularly vivid and satisfying manner the words in question. It would be of profit to the reader’s personal lexicon, whilst also familiarising the reader with the works of the Brontes, particularly in respect to their use of words in an intelligent context.

  2. If there isn’t room in the world of knowledge and understanding for such a thing as a Bronthesarus, I will no longer acknowledge that world’s existence… This is an idea of overwhelming brilliance.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s