Some Final Facts, For Now

As my Boston adventure draws to a close, I present two more of my ever-expanding list of ‘Random Facts about Stanley Pleeber’. Not the last two facts by any means, but the last you may find here for a while.

Fact no. 6: One of Pleeber’s most treasured and controversial possessions was a nail clipping said to have belonged to William Shakespeare. This single item could be said to be responsible for the great lack of respect Pleeber suffered from in his career. Even now we struggle to comprehend how it was he ever believed in the validity of the article in question. I ought to add, however, that he never claimed the clipping was from Shakespeare’s body itself; only that it had belonged to the late English playwright. From whose toe or finger the clipping actually came remains of one the world’s great mysteries.

Fact no. 7: In 1926, Stanley Pleeber sat for a portrait bust by local sculptor John P P Phillips. Though Phillips was said to have achieved a remarkable, even frightening likeness, Pleeber was disappointed by the finished product. ‘No one told me I was to have been cast in treacle’ he remarked, only to be reminded that the bust was, strictly speaking, made of bronze. ‘Bronze, schmonze,’ replied Pleeber, ‘it looks much like treacle to me’. From here on in, Pleeber was always an outspoken critic of both bronze and marble sculpture. Aligning himself with the young art critic Jeremy Baleknik (author of the infamous treatise Sculptors! Where is Your Colour?) he fought for the use of bright colours in public statues. In 1941 he got his wish, when a bright pink statue of Washington was unveiled in Swington, Connecticut. It was, sadly, pulled down by vandals within a week of its erection.

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Some Final Facts, For Now

  1. To what ‘filth’ you refer I cannot say for sure, though I’d always supposed that the popular press named the statue ‘Blushing Washington’ on account of its being painted pink…

  2. Was it, I wonder, a naturally occuring erection- some kind of organic stoney eruption arising from unusual but natural geological causes- an area I am humble enough to profess abjecet personal ignorants.
    Or a miraculous erection, arising from causes inaccessible to human reason?
    Or am I simply on the wrong track altogether?

  3. I am hesitant to describe any track as the wrong track; one likes, after all, to be open to all ideas and attitudes. On the other hand, the track on which you are choosing to travel – a somewhat dirty track, methinks – is not one I recognise. Nor would I advise anyone to take journeys of a significant length along that path.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s