The Road to Quebec

There was no one theme intended to sprint across this blog during the first few weeks of its existence. Nevertheless, such a theme has emerged. The theme to which I refer is that of ‘strange encounters with famous writers’, as seen here and here (and probably elsewhere too). Were I to really let myself go on this theme, the chances are that I would never stop writing. Suffice it to say, I have had more ‘strange encounters with famous writers’ than can be counted on the fingers and toes of a thousand horny toads. Many of these will no doubt dribble into this blog as the days drip by. For now, however, I present to you the first few sentences of Sebastian Cheraz’s review of Xenophobic Xavier:

“I was once privileged enough to meet one of Europe’s greatest novelists – Kirios Quebec – in the men’s room of an expensive Parisian hotel. As he began to relieve himself in the next door urinal, I chanced to ask him a question, knowing that he could not escape with speed. Considering the length of his novels, his prolific journalistic output and his famously ‘loose’ style, I was hoping to discover whether he had ever had any trouble writing, or whether it had always come naturally to him. “Ah!” he sighed, “Writing does not come naturally to anyone… If only writing was like peeing!”

Putting aside the quaint comparison between excretion and creativity, the keener readers among you may be a smidgen confused over this particular portrayal of Kirios Quebec. As both a previous post and a review have noted, Quebec is usually seen as a foul-tempered freak, inordinately fond of bathing his head in horse manure. Here, however, we find him in the unlikely surroundings of a swanky Parisian hotel, calmly answering awkward questions with something close to wit. Admittedly, he does lose his temper a little later on – still, it’s an altogether more kindly Quebec than that to which we are accustomed. An error? It ain’t necessarily so. With the possible exception of Pyetr Turgidovsky, I’ve yet to meet a mean and raving madman who hasn’t suffered a rare moment of politeness somewhere down the line. Well, we all make mistakes…

Incidentally, a couple of readers may have arranged their foreheads in the position of a frown following my proud use of ‘famous’ earlier in this post. Is Kirios Quebec famous? Is Paavo Laami famous? Not in my book, they grumble. Maybe not, I reply. Certainly, my idea of fame differs from that of other people. I refer to fame within a certain field: an outlying field, on the fringes of most other fields. But a small field? Again: it ain’t necessarily so. There is a lot of hair on the fringes of European culture: more hair than you can imagine. It is, some would say, a world unto itself. And I do not think myself mistaken in attributing fame to some of the loftier denizens of this great – and greatly neglected – world.

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The Road to Quebec

  1. I’ve always found Kirios Quebec’s obsession with the reproductive organs of bats a bit creepy. I’m presuming there’s symbolism going on, but for me its resonance fails to extend beyond Quebec’s private subjective experience.

  2. May I be forgiven if I am in error, but I have always thought that Quebec’s aforementioned obsession refered to the old French folk tale, ‘La Chauve-Souris et le pot de chambre’

  3. I have to admit my ignorants of ‘La Chauve-Souris et le pot de chambre’, and so you may be right in its connection. Though isn’t that in itself a touch too esoteric for all but the most encyclopaedically informed of readers. Quebec risks disappearing up what may be termed the Joycean Orifice of External Referrence.

  4. I will try my best to bring you up to date with the details of the ‘La Chauvre-Souris et le pot de chambre’ at a later date. It may well prove to be one of the texts collected, in one version or another (and there tend to be many), by Stanley Pleeber, through whose papers I am due to rifle this coming September.
    As for this peculiar observation of yours – ‘a touch too esoteric’ – what can a man say? This blog and its accompanying website has never risked disappearing up the JOER. On the contrary, it lives there.

  5. It’s probably best to admit my occasional estrangement from the JOER, not to say that this is a position of temporal ubiquitousness, which is to say that I am not formed of an intellectual framework of intransigent uniformity.
    One of my favourite stories of Quebec’s is ‘The Loudness of the Humming-Bird Meets the Silence of the Ghostdriver’, written as you no doubt are aware in a kind of linguisitc equivalence of the Peruvian pre-Raphaelites. The story isn’t semantically a complete success, but near as makes no difference.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s